I've really started to enjoy and appreciate him again since he showed up in TNA. Just a really entertaining heel.

One thing that I think TNA does incredibly well right now is playing to people's strengths while hiding weaknesses. Steiner barely wrestlers and they just let him talk. Wow, that's so hard to do the WWF could never figure that out. I honestly think he should get the title at Victory Road so that Samoa Joe can chase him for it.

I've also found Nash to be at his most entertaining since his early Wolfpack days.

SCOTT STEINER SHOULD NEVER GET THE TITLE.....PERIOD.

Even though he's done well since being in TNA.

I've always been a Steiner fan and yes I would agree the playing to his strengths is working perfectly. I'd say he's probably the best heel in the United States right now and if they keep putting him in matches with guys like Samoa Joe his in-ring work will really start to improve as well.

I don't think he should be long term or anything but I think they could draw with Joe taking the title off of him.

I would definitely give Steiner the belt. I believe their is big money to be made for a long term program of Joe chasing Steiner for the title.

I agree.

At Victory Road you have Steiner win that match and face Jarrett. Jarrett gets all cocky thinking Steiner will roll over for him and just have Steiner go crazy and destroy Jarrett for the title.

Then at the next PPV you do Steiner/Sting with Steiner getting DQed.

Then at the next show you do Steiner/Joe with Steiner not being able to beat Joe so he just gets himself DQed.

Then you go into another PPV and say since Steiner can't play by the rules that there will be no rules. Steiner/Joe in a cage match. Joe wins the title after a bloodly brawl.

And then for Sting's final match in the company you have him go down clean to Joe in a title match at Turning Point in December.

Yeah, but to have him face JJ then he'll turn face by default. He would have been better to beat Xian for it if anything.

Especially since he already jobbed to Joe. If they were going to do this they shouldn't have had them fight already. The magic won't last with that feud...

He'll be a face for the win over Jarrett but Steiner can turn everyone against him again in a matter of moments.

I know that, but that's really what TNA needs to STOP doing. They have a hard enough time creating faces and heels as it is. They NEED to be more consistant as far as that goes.

I agree with DK that you couldn't have him face JJ. This is part of why I've been saying they booked themselves into a corner with this latest JJ title win.

I personally loved Jarrett winning King of the Mountain, and like him going back on top with the title, if they choose to go that route.

I think Joe-Jarrett is where the money is, and now is the time to get the peices in place for the push into that eventual program.

Why? Jarrett is completely played out as far as this crowd goes. I can't think of one positive to him being champ again.

Especially if you saw Impact last night. When the crowd heard Cornette say he's firing someone last week, they immediately went for Jarrett. That's not heat, that's X-pac heat.

You're not really turning Steiner face though. He's just in a match with Jarrett and the crowd happens to hate him less. He just comes out the next night, does his usual thing and he's hated again. Doesn't hurt anyone in the process and it will be fine as long as they really sell the fact that the crowd is cheering for him because they hate Jarrett more than they hate Steiner at the moment.

Then how will Steiner be the top heel if it's obvious someone else is hated more? And I disagree anyway, If Steiner pummels JJ, he will be TNA's top face instantly.

You could remove Jarrett from the picture entirely after that so that he is the top heel. Or just have him take a backseat to Steiner. It can be done and Steiner is a strong enough heel and promo to not keep face heat off of beating Jarrett.

So the main event of your PPV is gonna be heel vs. heel? Where's the payoff?

I'm with WMD on this one. In a perfect world MD, you're idea could work. But this isn't a perfect world.

Yeah, I don't think Jarrett-Steiner would work at all. It is too dangerous with the reactions Steiner has been getting lately from the retards in the Impact zone. He & Nash got postivie reactions, where good portions of the fans got on Joe & Sabin.

Plus, do we even need to get into the shitfest of a match that could end up being?

Haha. Very good point. Although I was pleasantly surprised by Joe-Steiner, and really even the entire card as a whole at Slammiversary.

Same here, but I don't think I need to tell you that Steiner/Joe is MUCH different from Steiner/JJ.

Yes, trust me, I don't want any part of Double J/Steiner. I don't think it is even a good idea at all to put the title on Steiner, in any way. I know, it may be hypocritical, as I am for Jarrett holding the belt.

Basically I'm just so uninspired and down on Christian's reign as champ, that I want something new. They don't currently have a face developed that can hold it, and they blew their chance to have a monster heel champ in Abyss, so I default back to Jarrett. He at least draws heat, even if it is the wrong kind of heat.

I think it's worth the risk. The only other way to get it onto Steiner is doing 2 hotshot reigns. If someone's going to take it off of Jarrett they have to hold it for awhile. You can't put it on Sting because he needs to lose it to a young gun. Jarrett can't retain. Christian just had the belt. You can't put it on Joe because then he can't chase Steiner for the title.

The money is in Steiner/Joe. I believe that angle will draw money for them and put them on the map financially. You get that going really well and then promise Joe capping it off by winning the title and you could pop a huge buyrate.

I completely agree with your last paragraph.