View Full Version: Warrior v Goldberg

Da Wrestling Board > Total Non-Stop Action > Warrior v Goldberg



Title: Warrior v Goldberg
Description: We've all waited for this one....*FART*


jamiegeist - February 24, 2006 11:24 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
On Warrior's official Web site, in the , he has posted a proposal for TNA based on Sting's recent comments that Ultimate Warrior in TNA would be "interesting."

The following excerpts are quoted from his commentary. For the full post, click the above link:

Ok, something bluntly controversial before I leave? All right. Sting returned to wrestling. He said he trained for his return. Someone sent me pics. (No, I didn't buy the damn PPV!) My question: where did he train? Richard Simmons? Cellulite on a man is not a masculine thing -- it's not even a diva thing, is it? ...

... Steve also mentioned in the press conference that Ultimate Warrior coming to TNA would be interesting. Yes, I have to agree -- it would be very interesting. What would be more interesting is if the TNA execs had the creativity, integrity and balls to entertain it seriously. Frankly, what they should do, if they want to be competitive (there's that nasty blood, sweat and tears word again), is sell some of those construction materials Daddy Jarrett has laying around, and put up the financing to bring in Goldberg and Ultimate Warrior and let us try to beat the intensity out of one another. Now there's an idea -- an attention getting one, and a money making one. I mean, instead of always using "warrior" as the adjective to fallaciously describe all those who aren't -- bring a real, and Ultimate, one in. Let the hardcore, natural intensity rip. Let both of us take our mischaracterized heads halfway out of our asses, just enough for us to be businessmen capable of discussing the serious potential success yet not enough to defuse a competitive grudge, and let the serious and creative thinkers at TNA, those without an agenda or envy problem, work out a program. Put your silly ass fear and prejudice for my strong, bold character away and think SUCCESS. Hell, I'm all for great ideas. But don't expect me to keep my mouth shut when you don't come up with any. Of course, as I hinted at, it won't be inexpensive. Goldberg has an agent and has to give him a cut. I'm my own and I charge even more. The bigger obstacle, and definitely the one that has us both the most hated in the industry, is that we are strong individualists who don't need, or even necessarily want, to be in the business and can get along having great lives without it. But, what a way it would be for the most envied and despised to shove the final word down the throats of those Nor'Easterners, while TNA capitalizes off the incredible heat of it all.

Credit: UltimateWarrior.com


HAHAHAHAHA. Not in my wildest nightmares is Warrior/Goldberg a dream matchup. Ever.

Scrooge McSuck - February 24, 2006 11:33 PM (GMT)
I hate to say this, but I would pay top dollar to see Warrior/Goldberg...



No doubt everyone is already laughing at me, but for every silver lining there's a cloud. In this case, I only want to see it because of how bad it could be. I'm talking Warrior/Hogan II or Goldberg/Brock bad.

eStragand - February 24, 2006 11:39 PM (GMT)
Numbering in substantial mutlitudes is the amount of so-called buy rates that would be emanated by such a confrontation of cataclysmic proportions. There are those who would question such a mandate, but I say to those of the unbelieving front to rest upon your hind quarters and observe that which shall be referred to as legendary in ensuing decades.

whitemilesdavis - February 27, 2006 01:14 PM (GMT)
If built properly, and both men were completely protected before the match, Goldberg / Warrior could be a HUGE buyrate. Good match? No way.

dynamite kido - February 27, 2006 04:34 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (whitemilesdavis @ Feb 27 2006, 07:14 AM)
If built properly, and both men were completely protected before the match, Goldberg / Warrior could be a HUGE buyrate. Good match? No way.

I doubt it would be huge at all. Now I think that Goldberg DOES have some drawing ability but I think that the Warrior over time has totally killed his drawing power. His arrival in WCW and his WWF comeback in 96 both show that there was NOTHING significant in buyrates and ratings.

prof_plague - February 27, 2006 07:57 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (whitemilesdavis @ Feb 27 2006, 07:14 AM)
If built properly, and both men were completely protected before the match, Goldberg / Warrior could be a HUGE buyrate. Good match? No way.

Work doesn't mean anything in pro wrestling.

TheGreatWhiteChoate - February 27, 2006 10:33 PM (GMT)
I just desperately want to see Warrior back in a ring, where he can bring some much needed suck to TNA.

Big F'N Swigg - February 28, 2006 07:12 PM (GMT)
Goldberg would beat the shit out of Warrior, who would then sue him for assault and defamation of character




Hosted for free by InvisionFree