Title: What's the greatest WWE/WWF match of all time?
dynamite kido - December 22, 2004 11:48 PM (GMT)
Real F'n Show - December 22, 2004 11:51 PM (GMT)
Bret vs. Austin- WM13
My second favorite match of all time (behind Eddie vs. Rey from Havoc 97). Crowd heat, crowd brawling the way it should be done, good drama, blood, violence, a double turn, this match has it all. It's a no contest in my mind, this is the best match in WWF history IMO.
Scrooge McSuck - December 23, 2004 12:47 AM (GMT)
Greatest of ALL-TIME? I know we are trying to spark discussion... but ALL TIME? Uh...
Damn thats hard. If we're going by the biggest match of all time greatest, Hulk Hogan vs. Andre The Giant at Wrestlemania III, although it was shitty in terms of ring quality.
Bret vs. Austin from Wrestlemania XIII has previously been mentioned as one of the best brawls and manipulation of the crowd put on by WWE.
Austin vs. Rock from Wrestlemania X-Seven, although not a *****, was off-the-charts amazing in terms of quality and crowd heat generation.
I'll try to think of a few others later. My head hurts from playing too much GTA: San Andreas.
whitemilesdavis - December 23, 2004 02:43 AM (GMT)
I've got to go with Steambot/Savage WMIII. Just a great piece of storytelling, two legends at their best, and all the elements that remind me why I ever loved wrestling in the first place. At the time, all the near falls were an uncommon thing in a match, but it worked to perfection in terms of drawing the crowd in. Not my favorite match ever, but the best in WWE history.
dynamite kido - December 23, 2004 01:52 PM (GMT)
I honestly don't know if I could narrow it down to one....but here's my top five in no special order....
-Bret/Austin - WM 13
-Austin/Rock - WM X-7
-Owen/Bret - WM X
-Foley/Michaels - Mind Games
-Owen/Bret - Ironman
Real F'n Show - December 23, 2004 08:42 PM (GMT)
TehDoct0r - December 24, 2004 10:12 PM (GMT)
Randy Savage vs Ultimate Warrior, WrestleMania VII.
Savage dragged Warrior kicking and screaming to my favorite wrestling match ever. This thing oozed emotion. It was one of those matches that was obviously planned out to the smallest detail beforehand, but it was simply awesome. Everything they did was dramatic, the crowd was uber-hot, the announcing was top notch, the post match angle was awesome. People cried.
Benoit is God - December 26, 2004 01:13 AM (GMT)
Bret-Owen Mania 10 and Bret-Austin Mania 13 without question.
The work in Bret-Owen was higher-end, but the drama is better in Bret-Austin, so I don't know which I'd have at #1.
PedigreeMC - December 30, 2004 10:47 PM (GMT)
Hart/Austin WM 13
Bret/Owen Cage Match Summerslam 94
Hart/Austin Summerslam
Hogan/Warrior WMVI (Kinda partial to this one since its one of the only 3 WWE PPVs I got to see as a kid at the age of 10)
There are some WCW matches that I was a bigger fan of than these though.
WrestlingDreams - January 6, 2005 05:08 PM (GMT)
hart vs hbk ironman match is a true classic
Real F'n Show - January 6, 2005 06:07 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (WrestlingDreams @ Jan 6 2005, 11:08 AM) |
| hart vs hbk ironman match is a true classic |
That match was boring as hell, dude. I wouldn't call it a classic, let alone the greatest WWF match of all time. There's dozens of matches that are better than it.
SamoaRowe - January 6, 2005 07:27 PM (GMT)
Bret vs Owen has my vote.
Scrooge McSuck - January 6, 2005 07:30 PM (GMT)
Bret/Shawn had a nice build to it, I'll agree there. The training videos and the "non-touching of each other before the match" was a good idea.
However... the match, for the first 25 minutes, was the most brutally boring match I can remember seeing. Shawn can NOT work a mat wrestling based match and Bret Hart no-selling everything Shawn did to his arm didn't help.
The match did pick up for the second half, and I still find the sweet chin music to the timekeeper and crazy insane spot where Michaels being dumped over a turnbuckle to the floor awesome, but the match is ruined because of the first half and both mens selfishness of not wanting to job the first fall of the match.
Benoit is God - January 21, 2005 02:46 AM (GMT)
Old topic, but...
The Bret-Shawn iron man is underrated by a lot of people. I really don't buy most of the general criticisms of it. They big ones seem to be:
- Shawn's matwork was bad/didn't go anywhere. I don't think it's bad, just decent or average, and it wasn't meant to go somewhere. It was a means of control fitting into a story about avoiding mistakes.
- Bret no-sold the armwork. I don't have a big problem with this. He shakes off relatively-light control offense. Most of the time Shawn was simply holding Bret's arm. Could he have sold it more? Yes. Is it a major flaw? I really can't say it is.
- No falls. They could've added a couple, yes. But the story is oneupmanship, leading to Shawn trying to avoid mistakes (this is something Bret pointed out in pre-match interviews - he expected Shawn to screw up and said he'd take advantage when he did), leading to Shawn realizing he needs to take risks in order to win as the time runs out. And this story doesn't need a lot of falls.
It's not a great match, probably ***-ish for those who use flakes, just a good/decent match that went longer than it should've.
Scrooge McSuck - January 21, 2005 02:49 AM (GMT)
***-ish is definitely reasonable. It's monsters who say ****-****1/2 and call it one of the best matches in history that makes people come in to tear it apart. (Not to point fingers, but most people I came across who loved this match are, shockingly, HBK fans)
TehDoct0r - January 21, 2005 08:16 PM (GMT)
That's weird, because I think HBK has had TONS of other matches that smoke that. It was a great moment at the end, but he had at least a half dozen matches that year alone that were better than it.
dynamite kido - January 21, 2005 08:53 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Charlotte Bobcat @ Jan 20 2005, 08:49 PM) |
| ***-ish is definitely reasonable. It's monsters who say ****-****1/2 and call it one of the best matches in history that makes people come in to tear it apart. (Not to point fingers, but most people I came across who loved this match are, shockingly, HBK fans) |
Personally, I think you are a little hard on HBK CB. There are a shitload of guys that aren't as good as him, but people give them more credit than Shawn. Like it or not, but I would lump Kurt Angle in that category. Personally, I would put the Mania 12 ironman at about ***1/4, but I couldn't see it getting more prase than that. I really find it humorous when people try and throw a ** or less rating at it because then you can see that person has some HBK hatred going on.
TehDoct0r - January 21, 2005 08:56 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (dynamite kido @ Jan 21 2005, 02:53 PM) |
There are a shitload of guys that aren't as good as him, but people give them more credit than Shawn. Like it or not, but I would lump Kurt Angle in that category. |
I agree 100 percent. Don't get me wrong, I like Kurt, but Shawn is truely a top-tier worker when he wants to be.
dynamite kido - January 21, 2005 09:00 PM (GMT)
Not to mention that Angle may just be the most overrated guy EVER. Don't get me wrong, I like Kurt.......but he's in the Observer Hall of Fame for Christ's sake. He's not THAT good.....
Scrooge McSuck - January 21, 2005 09:18 PM (GMT)
Angle and HBK can shake hands with each other. Both are probably the leaders in most over-rated ever when it comes to in-ring quality, both have occasionally good promos (while people ejaculate in their pants over every one of them), and both have horrible time selling ANYTHING longer than 44 seconds.
I like watching their matches, but I am usually unbias in my opinions. Watch any Coliseum Video tape from 1992-93 with an HBK match. Most of them are horrible messes, while HBK super-fans will claim they are ***+. Most of Angle's free TV matches are garbage, and many of his PPV matches are over-rated. How the hell did that IronMan match get ****?!?! I say ** tops. TOPS!
(rant mode off)
TehDoct0r - January 22, 2005 02:26 AM (GMT)
I still think if you look at their entire bodies of work, HBK has the far better career. He may also have a longer one, but still.
Scrooge McSuck - January 22, 2005 02:36 AM (GMT)
MAY have a longer one? Shawn's been a "Pro Wrestler" for 20 years (actually 16, since he didn't wrestle at all for 1999-2001) while Angle has barely been 5 (minus injuries... 3.5) and is already on the verge of retirement thanks to numerous injuries piled up.
LOOK AT HIS ARMS! They're horrible looking.
Real F'n Show - January 22, 2005 02:53 AM (GMT)
I'm personally not a fan of either. I do enjoy certain matches of theirs, but like CB, I find them both horribly overrated. Just because the WWE tells you HBK is a legend and a great wrestler doesn't mean you have to believe it. He's had some GREAT matches, I'll give him that, and he's excellent at bringing drama to a match. I just can't stand his promos and his boring as hell moveset from 10 years ago. And his selling...
As for Angle, he's been overrated by the internet since his debut. He's a good athlete and all, and he seems to have picked up bits and pieces of psychology, but he's still shoddy on the selling, unless he's in there with Benoit or someone.
Both men do have a nack for carrying hosses to great matches though.
Scrooge McSuck - January 22, 2005 02:57 AM (GMT)
I don't believe Angle has really carried anyone major. The only exception is maybe a match with Kane on Smackdown in the winter of 2001-02, and Kane isn't THAT bad of a wrestler, just horrible under-rated because he's a "hoss". Besides, Benoit had TWO better matches with Kane than Angle did, so :D
Real F'n Show - January 22, 2005 03:15 AM (GMT)
His match with Big Show at Armageddon 2002 was pretty good I thought. And yeah, that Kane match you are talking about was great as well.
Scrooge McSuck - January 22, 2005 03:22 AM (GMT)
Big Show is pretty good I think (for a man his size, that is). It's just when he's lazy is when he sucks, which was pretty much all of his 2000 run before being sent to OVW to lose +43 pounds. No one is going to confuse him for a masterful wrestler, but he can hold his own quite well.
Mad Dog - January 22, 2005 05:32 AM (GMT)
I lost it with Angle when he had the gaul to complain to management about Guerrero actually selling his moves instead of popping right back up so he could hit another one.
Scrooge McSuck - January 22, 2005 05:41 AM (GMT)
We all know Angle's only "original" move is the Angle-Slam, and all it is is a variation of the firemans carry.
Ankle Lock? Ken Shamrock
Rolling Germans/Any Germans? Chris Benoit
Moonsault? Countless people do them
Hell, I think I've seen Ultimo Dragon and Jushin Liger do his no sell, run up the ropes, and belly to belly someone off the top rope spot years before Angle debuted.
Angle is basically a persons Create-A-Wrestler. he does someone elses big moves, and is basically unoriginal. HIS THEME MUSIC IS RECYCLED FOR GOD'S SAKE! NOTHING ORIGINAL!
Mad Dog - January 22, 2005 05:45 AM (GMT)
Yeah, him taking Benoit's triple german suplex thing really really irritated me. The anklelock wasn't so bad because Shamrock wasn't at least in the company at the time but the Benoit thing just reeked of him being an ass.
Mad Dog - January 22, 2005 05:47 AM (GMT)
Just to add. I think Lesnar blew Angle out of the water as far as inring ability went. He had a better moveset and *gasps* actually used psycology in his matches.
Scrooge McSuck - January 22, 2005 05:48 AM (GMT)
You're right... everyone and their mother does it (the Ankle-Lock) now. The Jobber who fought Raven on Impact absolutely no sold it for 20 seconds (Cassidy Riley I think it was).
Scrooge McSuck - January 22, 2005 05:48 AM (GMT)
Lesnar actually knew how to sell, even for the Hardyz when he was squashing them like grapes.
Real F'n Show - January 22, 2005 04:25 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Charlotte Bobcat @ Jan 21 2005, 11:48 PM) |
| You're right... everyone and their mother does it (the Ankle-Lock) now. The Jobber who fought Raven on Impact absolutely no sold it for 20 seconds (Cassidy Riley I think it was). |
Thank god Raven broke his fingers afterwards...
And Brock was 5 times the worker Angle was. His moveset was better, he was a better heel, and he knew how to sell properly.
TehDoct0r - January 22, 2005 04:59 PM (GMT)
Thank God. I'm not the only one who thinks so.
Real F'n Show - January 22, 2005 05:02 PM (GMT)
Yeah, I've NEVER been too high on Angle.
TehDoct0r - January 22, 2005 05:04 PM (GMT)
I like me some Angle, but I really thought Lesnar was amazing. I dunno, maybe it's because he's fucking monstrous and can also move, but I've liked the guy since the moment I saw him. And he picked up the pro style way faster than Angle did, in my opinion.
Scrooge McSuck - January 22, 2005 05:06 PM (GMT)
Angle is the better amatuer wrestler, though. :D He won the 1996 Olympics with a broken freakin' neck.
Brock F-Fiving and throwing people like Show and Mark Henry around like they were cruiserweights was amazing.
TehDoct0r - January 22, 2005 06:00 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Charlotte Bobcat @ Jan 22 2005, 11:06 AM) |
Angle is the better amatuer wrestler, though. :D He won the 1996 Olympics with a broken freakin' neck.
|
I'm no ameature wrestling enthusiast, but I'd have to agree. Ask any guy who knows anything about that world, and they'd take Angle over Lesnar in a heartbeat. I think I'd like to see a shoot between them, because Angle supposedly has superior skill, but Brock has so much size.
Scrooge McSuck - January 22, 2005 06:52 PM (GMT)
I heard they had a few backstage confrontations in a competitve fassion, and Angle schooled Brock each time.
TehDoct0r - January 22, 2005 07:12 PM (GMT)
I'd believe it.
Ya think he could still do that nowadays with his degenrating physical condition?